Can the Nevada governor ban open and concealed carry by emergency fiat like the New Mexico governor?
 
No. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina where gun confiscation actually happened, Congress and many of the states rushed to pass legislation limiting emergency powers. COVID showed us that emergency powers given to state governors all them to become actual dictators and many of the feckless legislators allow them to wield those powers without complaint.
 
So in the case of New Mexico, the leftist Democratic Governor Michelle Lujan banned the open and concealed carry of firearms for 30 days in Albuquerque (calling them “privileges”) due to a bunch of murders in that town. She basically acknowledged it was symbolic and both the county sheriff and the police chief made wishy-washy statements that they wouldn’t really be enforcing it.
 
Not only does this order fly in the face of the New Mexico state constitution and the US Constitution, especially the Bruen precedent, it’s unconscionable. It can only be pandering to the left’s political base and a trial balloon to see what far-left governors can get away with. That being said, let’s look at Nevada.

So no, not even anti-gun Sisolak could do anything about guns in a state of emergency. You may recall places like Bass Pro Shops being unable to sell sporting goods equipment during the shutdown but the gun counter being open (though empty).
 
Finally, your rights to self-defense and to bear arms are inalienable and cannot be taken away by an emergency order. All you have to do is not get caught, which can be a little tricky, but as they say about those folks in Maui, “only those who disobeyed survived.”

I bought this PSA Dagger complete upper (slide) and Holosun sight a few months ago. It was a great deal and the quality is great. Slipped right on my Gen 3 Glock 19 frame. I have no complaints about the sight or the slide. It gets flying colors for my reviews.

However, the sighting system troubles me, as it does a lot of experienced shooters. Learning to shoot a pistol red dot is a new skillset and it's not coming easily. I'm sure it will with practice, but I need to shoot a lot. That means 9mm will be expensive. For the cost of 1000 rounds of 9mm I can shoot 5000 of .22. So I'm pretty sure I'll be buying a Sig P320 with a Romeo Zero. 

As for this assembly, I may dispose of it or keep it and see. I don't know yet. I certainly would not have bought it except to review (probably the same with the Sig with the Romeo Zero). 

So a few years ago I bought a Glock 44 for a quick review; the intent was to shoot it and sell it. Turns out, I love that gun. At 10-15k rounds (I lost count), it has held up well. I still think that it hits a few inches low, but I haven't gotten around to calling customer service.

Anyhow, the gun is dead reliable. After about 1000 rounds with no cleaning, I might have some failures to extract or feed, but that's mostly ammo related. It definitely prefers to be a clean gun. Even so, it doesn't have to be pristine and it will keep eating ammo for a long time, just like a 9mm Glock.

My shooting skills have improved tremendously now that I can shoot 300-1000 rounds a session for very cheap. I do this usually every weekend in the summer, less in the colder months. It is an excellent training platform and the recoil is enough, thanks to the lightweight polymer hybrid slide, to have to keep a proper sight picture, just like on a full-size cartridge. People tout dry fire but I tout combat style .22 pistols.

My armorer/rangemaster buddy and his wife love the gun. It's fun to shoot. The 10 round mags suck and the Promag 18 rounders suck more (the loading tools 3D printers sell online help), but just buy like 10 or more magazines so you can load while the gun cools down and shoot a long string.

Up next is a Sig P322 with a red dot sight, to learn that system on the cheap. I see the point of pistol dots, but I'm not convinced they're for me. I'll review that gun and put a few thousand rounds through it and see how I feel about them after. Not sure I'll keep that gun, but we'll do a long term (like six month) test on it and see.

All in all, I would never have bought a .22 pistol, especially the Glock 44, if it wasn't something I could review, but I'm very glad that I did. Whatever your platform of choice is, I recommend getting the .22 equivalent to train realistically very cheaply and have fun at the same time.

Sine day has come and gone; the three anti-gun bills that passed out of the legislature were vetoed by Governor Lombardo (thanks, Joe!). He might have differing views on guns be he can be counted on doing the right thing by us single-issue voters.

Note: this bill is inoffensive but it does place a burden on gun dealers to post a sign about negligent storage (I'm sure that'll do something) and provide a gun lock with each gun sale or transfer. This will add costs to the consumer and will apply to private sales. However, the additional training required of school districts and police regarding active shooters is not a bad thing. Essentially, this bill is a status-quo bill. 

None of the measures imposed on gun dealers or gun owners will have a meaningful impact on violence or incidents of children bringing guns to schools. It is a "feel-good" bill that does nothing to alter the behavior of persons who already have the means at their disposal to secure their firearms. A cheap lock will not apply itself no deter a determined and intelligent juvenile from accessing a gun. The problems with kids bringing guns to school is one rooted in poor parenting and a culture that celebrates violence.

Clark County School District officials are complaining about kids bringing guns to school. They rightly blame the parents, but for the wrong reasons. Safe storage (locking them away from kids) is one part of the equation. 

The school district wants to encourage and educate families about safe storage, which is a laudable goal and actual gun safety (versus the gun control deceptively branded as "safety"). Safe storage is not the problem. It is trivial to secure a gun against casually putting it in a backpack. Trigger and cable locks are handed out for free. Virtually every gun comes in a lockable plastic case. Small safes are easy to find. All of these steps will prevent a child from simply getting access. Of course, they won't stop a child smart enough to break the lock/case from getting it, but they will serve as a basic deterrent if only through mom or dad noticing the damage.

Poor parenting is the problem. The kind of parents who have kids that take guns to school are going to disproportionately be low-class (behaviorally speaking), who offer their children minimal supervision and discipline, and would are undeterred by the potential of criminal charges for negligently allowing their kid access to a gun. In contrast, parents who would lock up their guns and teach their kids not to mess around with them probably have raised their children in such a way that, if the gun was accessible, the kid wouldn't take it to school.

So what CCSD is facing is a bunch of crappy parents who can't do the right thing in the first place. The root of the problem with guns in schools is with the parenting, not the gun safe. All the education, laws, and locks in the world won't matter a damn if the parent doesn't care, doesn't use them, and won't raise their kid right.

The governor vetoed all three anti-gun bills that were passed by the Democratic majority legislature. 

Defeated are:
AB 354-Bans firearms within 100 yards of an "election" site.
AB 355-Bans possession of semi-auto shotguns and rifles for those under 21.
SB 171 Misdemeanor "hate crimes" prohibited person gun ban.

As a reminder, there are no good gun bills that are going to pass, like constitutional carry. It's unlikely any other gun bills will be passed this year. 

I've been looking into red dot on pistol slides for a while but I didn't want to get anything milled. So when the PSA Dagger came out (Glock Gen 3 compatible) I saw a smoking deal on the above pictured slide and went for it. For the record, it is a complete slide assembly with a Holosun HS507C X2 red dot sight with a threaded barrel.

Why? I wanted to somewhat cheaply test out what all this pistol optic business is about. It's a whole different sighting system that requires new skills to rapidly align the sight and dot on target. Once you learn to do that, it's a lot faster than it seems the first time you pick one up. Also you can make more precise shots at a distant with the optic. 

I went with the Holosun because of the price and I like the "shake to wake" function. The threaded barrel has obvious future applications. Another advantage would be using passive aiming with a pistol while using night vision. That's very difficult to do with even tritium iron sights. Perfect for...handgun hunting small game in the dark...or something. 

I'll post more about my initial shooting experience, but it is viable but also you may prefer to stick with irons. I haven't decided yet, but I know I will never consider irons as dead, and may consider them primary. If it wasn't for the deal and my ability to review stuff to blog about, I wouldn't have bought it, I'll hint at that much for now.

The National Firearms Act (NFA) requires that all "silencers" (sound suppressors) be registered including paying a $200 tax. Secret draft documents obtained by Nevada Carry show that the ATF is planning on reclassifying many common rifles as integrally suppressed. That means the rifles inherently have a sound suppressing ability in their original design without needing a separate suppressor (silencer) to be attached. This will require that tens or even hundreds of millions of rifles be registered with the ATF or owners will become federal felons.

The ATF defines a "silencer" as anything that reduces or suppresses the sound of a gunshot. Up until now, regulated suppressors (silencers) acted like an auto muffler where pressurized exhaust gases expanded slowly in a chamber to be released to the atmosphere. The controlled expansion, cooling, and slow release of the gas reduced the sound. In guns, this can reduce the sound level by up to 30 dB.

With this new classification, a rifle barrel itself may be considered a suppressor. This is based on the fact that longer barrels allow powder to burn for a longer time and more completely in the barrel before exiting. The gas volume is also lower in longer barrels which also contributes to a lower sound profile than in shorter barrels. If you've ever shot an 8" AR pistol you know what they mean. A 16" rifle is much quieter. It is the fact that the longer barrel makes the gunshot less loud that the ATF is objecting to.

Press release on SB 367.

See the Review-Journal article: "Bill would allow multiple charges for felons with guns."