If you’ve applied for a concealed carry weapon (CCW) permit through the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD), you’ve probably experienced the frustratingly long wait times. While Sheriff Lombardo has repeatedly claimed the delays are due to bottlenecks at the FBI or the Nevada Department of Public Safety (DPS), the real issue lies much closer to home. According to someone directly involved in the process, the primary reason for the delay is insufficient staffing in LVMPD’s CCW department.
Recently, it was confirmed that the FBI and DPS processes are not the culprits. The DPS portion of the background check, for example, typically takes 2-4 weeks. Other Nevada counties—with far fewer resources than Clark County—consistently process CCW permits within this timeframe. So why does LVMPD take upwards of 90 days, sometimes longer? It comes down to the simple fact that there aren’t enough people working in the department to handle the overwhelming volume of applications. We learned some eye-opening numbers. When LVMPD reduced its processing times from 120 days to around 90, it was because the department doubled its staff from 3 to 6 full-time employees. That improvement came only after years of pleading for additional resources. Yet even with those gains, the department is still woefully understaffed. With more than 30,000 applications annually, 6 staff members are expected to manage the workload, which breaks down to thousands of applications per person every year. When asked about the sheriff’s insistence that DPS is to blame, the insider didn’t mince words. She agreed that this excuse doesn’t hold water. Other counties, processing the same DPS checks, turn permits around in weeks, not months. The real bottleneck is at the local level, where LVMPD’s limited staff is drowning in a backlog. Ironically, the “most populous county with the most permit applications” excuse only highlights LVMPD’s inefficiency. With a larger population and more applications, one would expect economies of scale to improve processing times, not hinder them. Instead, the lack of investment in staffing has led to delays that frustrate applicants and tarnish the department’s reputation. If there’s any takeaway from this situation, it’s that the problem is fixable. More staffing would drastically reduce processing times, as proven by the improvement seen when the department doubled its workforce. For applicants stuck in limbo, it’s time to question why such a high-demand service hasn’t been given the resources it needs. Until then, don’t expect the sheriff’s excuses to hold up under scrutiny. Sorry, no voting guide this year. It became too much for our volunteer with too little return. Short version: vote Trump for president and Republican party-line all the way down-ballot. This isn't a time for principles but basically Republicans, as weak as they may be, or turbo-communism. Voting Republican down-ballot is important to keep the state legislature (and Congress) from flipping to Democrat control. This is important in Nevada as just a few seats stand between sanity and a Democrat super-majority that can override the governor's vetoes.
For local races, check out local GOP recommendations. Sorry left-leaning voters, we can't trust Democrat-allied politicians on the Second Amendment or freedom anymore. For judges, vote "none of these" for Supreme Court (the incumbents are crapbags) and for the rest of the judicial races, you need to do your own research or simply leave them blank. I guess later this week we'll know if Nevada will go the way of California and America to communist hell. On the plus side, if the enthusiasm for Trump and Republican voting carries over, we may see a red wave, flipping the state legislature, or at least keeping the Dems from gaining near-total power. Vote like your life depends on it, because it does. No matter who wins, the hour the Second Amendment was made for approaches quickly. Make your dispositions accordingly. I love Safariland's ALS thumb release. WAY better than the GLS and less annoying than the "duty" SLS strap. I was happy to find this holster that fit my P365 for open carry. Remember folks, responsible open carriers use retention holsters!
Short version is bus passengers on RTC buses are trash and commit violence. So RTC is adding armed security and "gun detection" cameras. Couple of things: this appears aimed at scumbags committing crimes, not a general "no guns" policy. In other words, RTC is doing more than security theater.
As for the gun detection thing, sounds like they're looking for people using guns in a criminal manner, not people who are merely carrying. As a reminder, open and concealed carry is still legal on RTC buses. It's not prohibited by law and in theory state preemption would apply. Also I don't think RTC is actually worried about the peaceable open/concealed carrier. In Garland v. Cargill, the US Supreme Court found that the ATF overreached and exceeded its authority by banning bump fire stocks by fiat. Per SCOTUS, the ATF can outlaw things by regulation alone; only Congress can do that. But it would be perfectly okay under this ruling for Congress to have outlawed bump fire stocks, because apparently "shall not be infringed" is too complicated for SCOTUS to understand. Anyhow, legislative bans are still okay, and the ban in Nevada is at the state level, so it still stands. In Nevada, bump stocks are illegal to possess, make, transfer, or sell under NRS 202.274. This statute was enacted in response to the Mandalay Bay shooting on October 1, 2017. Violation of this law is classified as a category D felony, carrying penalties of 1 to 4 years in state prison and fines up to $5,000.
Continuing on the theme of .22 caliber equivalents of carry/duty pistols for plinking and cheap practice to build high reps at low costs, I bought at SIG P322 with a red dot sight to "learn" how to shoot pistol red dots.
First observations is that red dots on pistols are great. I had a much better experience than with the Glock/Holosun combo a while back. But the SIG Romeo Zero Elite red dot sucks. Issue #1 is the red dot brightness spontaneously changing when firing (see photos). The button is also terribly placed, too small, and too hard to activate. Right size housing, crappy everything else. I get the feeling it'll fail early and need to be replaced with something else. Other than that, I'm impressed with the pistol itself. Will probably replace the Glock 44 for plinking, though the Glock and its iron sights will be the preferred practice tool, since I don't carry a red dot for self-defense. Mission First Tactical Translucent EXD 30 Polymer Magazine
Can it hold up like other see-through polymer mags? Lancer, for example? The feed lips on this one are all plastic. If so, looks promising. Only 13 states had open carry bans prior to 1900, 3 of which were repealed before 1900, and 2 more shortly thereafter. Mainly it was in the South where all forms of carry were banned before the 20th century. You’ll notice from reading these that there is often an evolutionary process and the legislators were basically guessing on what might make violence stop. After the 20th century, immigration pressures and increasing urbanization seem to have spurred the adoption of greater handgun regulation. Before this, the history shows concealed weapon laws were an attempt at crime control; "If they can't carry guns, then they won't shoot each other!" Well, we know that experiment failed. My research is incomplete and stops around the 1920s-1930s due to the limitations of online databases. I've also stopped at the early modern era, going up to the late 1910s and 1920s "Model Pistol Acts" that were the predecessors and inspiration for the National Firearms Act. You'll notice that western states repealed their bans, as did other states. The "why" is what remains to research. In some cases they just wrote the new laws to either exclude (or include, in those cases) open carry. Idaho's supreme court threw out the open carry ban, as did Georgia's, except the latter went ahead and reinstated it later anyway. Some of these laws may be debatable: South Carolina's 1901 restriction made it so that basically any pratical handgun was unable to be carried; I suppose AR pistols would have been kosher. A Tennessee court decision that would do today's 9th Circuit proud allowed one to openly carry a pistol in the hand, i.e. as one would use while chasing a burglar or defending himself (sorta like California today!), although no one in their right mind would just walk around normally with a pistol in their hand. ![]()
So dude's dog little fluffy dog gets attacked by a Rottweiler, guy goes to grab the dog away, gets bit in the process, and shoots the Rottweiler. A human gets pepper sprayed ("maced") after.
Some interesting points. Pepper spray came into play AFTER the defensive gun use. Note that the owner didn't try pepper spraying the dog first. Potentially, using it first against the dog v. shooting could have adversely affected the humans and the victim's ability to ward of further attack. A verbal and possibly physical confrontation followed the dog attack. The witnesses were apparently pissed off. They didn't feel that the shooter was a threat to them. Also it looks like some of the bystanders tried to take the shooter's dog or the leash away. Someone felt it would be safe enough to confront a guy who just fired a gun, possibly trying to whack the guy with a plastic thing (that person was pepper sprayed). The newspaper highlights in addition to his pistol, the shooter had a pocketknife and pepper spray; all stuff that is routinely carried by prepared citizens as part of the EDC. |
Archives
December 2024
CategoriesBlog roll
Clayton E. Cramer Gun Watch Gun Free Zone The War on Guns Commander Zero The View From Out West |